1. Nope, because you can reason it pretty easily in-game. Poor use of context clues is not a failure of writing. She said she stayed because she didn't want to leave him alone.

2. Except Tozu never said they were past events, he said they were secrets. The students also would not assume a pattern because the notes were never shared publicly. For all we know, and they know, half the notes are not about the past. And no, it wouldn't be strange, because it happened. It has already been established Tozu cares more about furthering the game than honesty. It is perfectly reasonable to think one note would be an advantage to kickstart the killing. I have said this multiple times already.

3. No, again. Jury's are not a hivemind. There are PLENTY of occasions of innocent people being given a verdict of guilty. This is just incorrect. No one else would be capable of causing those explosions besides Eva, and no one would be able to see besides Eva, so how she got the tools doesn't matter. Beyond a reasonable doubt.

4. It takes 5 minutes to change a doorknob. Not farfetched at all. 

1. Wrong, it was already confirmed by the creators that is in fact what happened. Her memory shows him waking up after a few attempts because that is the recollection of important events... not because that is absolutely everything that happened.

2. Wrong, literally not all of the letters are past events. Tozu never said they were past events; he said they were secrets. If you want to be technical about the motive (despite the fact Tozu has already shown he is not), Desmond may have lied about not knowing the weapons were there, and it's even implied at one point by Damian. Not like it matters though, Tozu has shown to bend the truth and rules to aid the killing game. He literally said he doesn't lie then was promptly shown lying. Tozu is not a reliable narrator.

3. Wrong, courts do not require the prosecution to prove every single aspect of a case, but to prove BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that only the defendant could have committed that crime. That's exactly the point made by Damian: We don't know how Eva got the weapons, but we do know that no one besides her could have done it. Even then, this isn't a court case, this is a class trial with 16 students.

4. Tools to turn the doorknob? You can turn a doorknob at home with any random thing you find. It's incredibly easy. No faulty logic by the game, just a lack of manual labor by yourself 😅

I made an account just to reply to this text just because it was really... poorly thought out. 

1. her recollection is of key moments, not solely what happened. Him being drugged, and her trying to stabilize him, lasted those 45 minutes.

2. The letters were an incentive to murder. Your point that the letters HAVE to be solely historical secrets relies on the belief Tozu is a neutral observer who doesn't twist the truth. He is not. Tozu's goal is to aid people in killing, and if that means twisting rules, making deals with the students, hiding key information, OR giving someone a heads up about where weapons are stashed... then he'll do it. Tozu is on the team of the blackened.

3. If we know that the drag racer has lithium batteries in his room, it then logically follows that the ultimate marksman has weapons. Not that far of a reach at all, and Desmond's letter seemed to confirm that when it stated "weapons in hand". We also don't see the picture on his letter, I believe, which may have shown where the weapons were.

4. The students literally make it a point that they don't exactly know when she accessed the items, but that it doesn't matter because she is the only one who had the information to even know to search his room anyways. There couldn't possibly be anyone else who had done it, so filling in the last gaps was not necessary. They overtly state this.

5. Doors can, in fact, lock themselves once closed. They are pretty common actually.