I personally believe this is a game worth looking at. If you came from ARMA 3 and played Tanoa alot, this hits that itch. just no vehicles that can be driven by players. I have only done PVE so this is my experiance.

I get this is a tarkov competetor. Sure its techically an extraction shooter. you die and lose your stuff and 1 chance to reclaim your stuff. If the game didn't have the camps around the map, id give up already cause it isn't a small zone. literal large world on one single map vs multiple ones. Its got your lower level towns closer to main base then harder as you go on.

Guns are a weird balance but not bad. AI can be a hit or miss when it comes down to skill level. There isn't any way to actually sneak around crouched. it may be minimized but still get detected rather easily. This isn't a splinter cell game level of stealth. The bushes do affect visability to AI but not impossible to have a lucky shot since most just spray bullets.

Overall, this is a good game, I recommend.

My take on performance.

Game performance is weird. Framegen helps but shouldn't be a crutch. The methods for optimization are interesting but I still believe some of the methods of optimization will need to be re-looked at. Some stuff just doesn't need shadows turned on. that would help. The Culling distances balance is impressive. I get not having a rendering distance fog like in ARMA (As example) to help with world setting and scale (I like this idea this was a neat idea, keep it in the game if at all possible). But there is performance to be given back if less objects are on screen when it is further out like the cliff and trees all the way across the map on areas outside of the play area.

Do I know the setup of how the map's assets are handled? no, not entirely, but there are ways to give back performance in terms of draw calls.

I get for PVP you have to give it a fair fight for people at different game graphics and quality settings, but what is more important? Awesome Movie quality graphics with performance issues, or good graphics with better performance but there are compromises with shadows on smaller objects as a simple example.

This is in no way a replacement to battlefield game titles. PERIOD. destruction isn't really there. Yes it exsists but in limited fashion.

If you played Warface, the gameplay of the player controller feels like it (your character don't feel like a fat guy trying to move around when sprinting). just no infield attachment editor and no horrible repair weapon system. Personally I like how that game plays and delta force here plays similar. This is sorta the only thing I can compare it to in terms of feel.

Snipers are OP if you can figure out how to use the middle dot of the cross hair and press the aim down sights button quick. don't even need to be in full scope. (in summary basically quicker than a COD quick scope). still have to lead moving targets sorta.

LMGS can be a rapid fire laser if you are able to figure out the recoil cause the spread is very narrow.


Vehicles are there yes. But feels very lacking. a 4 wheeler feels like a ue4 demo vehicle physics model but worse.

If the game continues in the supposed direction, there is a game audience.

If it falls down the Warface route where they implement skinned weapons have damage/stat modifiers though they claim they won't. don't bother with this game and it will fall to the grave like WarFace and other games that tried doing this.

Also remember, game is affiliated with Tencent.

game is dead and so is your installation you paid a 100 USD for is a literal disk space paperweight